Organized Entanglement: Fiber and Textile Arts, Science and Engineering
Fri, 03/12/2021 - 18:00 — AdrianFreed
In 2017 I participated in the e-Textile Summer Camp[1] at the Paillard Centre d’Art Contemporain & Résidence d’Artistes in Poncé sur le Loir, a small village 214 km from Paris.
Rachel Freire insisted that I joined this panel discussion chaired by Dr. Becky Stewart:
"The History of Computing and Weaving, the Consumer Society and Data Democratisation"
with Becky Stewart, Audrey Briot, Rachel Freire and Adrian Freed
July 22 17:00- 18:00
I have researched the history of electronics, computing and e-textiles, but I thought I was likely going to be a "hair in the soup"–as the French say–as I don't have a portfolio of e-textile works that comes anywhere near the quality of that of my co-panelists. I reflexively took the role of respondent and prompted my copanelists into elaborating on their work and curiosities. I first noted that their work shows how we can rescue the worn out adjective "digital" by celebrating a continuity between the "digital" and "numerical" aspects of quipu (and it's ancient analogs) and contemporary e-textile projects - which very often involve interactions with our digits in gloves or interacting textile surfaces.
My second response was an improvisation on some philosophical work I had been doing on entrainment and entanglement.
I am grateful to Hannah Perner Wilson, a key instigator in the Summer camps, for encouraging me write these ideas down.
This note is a kind of writing where I am often told to "unpack" the ideas or integrate a line of argument. Thankfully Hannah found value in this writing without me addressing those concerns. She saw potential in it as part of a "zine" for woolpunkers, a pataphysical take on e-textiles inventors.
So, instead of unpacking the text, I illustrate it below in the style of a gloss.
Organized Entanglement
I propose the term "Organized Entanglement" to encompass fiber and textile
art, design, engineering and science.
The adjective "organized" is suggested to parallel the way we
sometimes use "Organized Sound” – as an inclusive definition of music.
My intention is to be descriptive not proscriptive. No narrowings need
be made as to who or how this organization becomes manifest or is conceptualized.
The noun "entanglement" identifies processes that produce a
wide variety of forms and afford varieties of entrainments. The forms can be readily categorized using patterns studied in
topology,
mereotopology
and geometry.
Entrainments involve dynamic concerns, couplings, and linkages - both material and social.
Entrainment may be thought of as the manifestations of a common fate of
elements of an assemblage.
Painting and inking, for example, are ways of entraining
pigments to produce color and texture effects on surfaces. These
pigments are entrapped in place by a medium which moves between vapor or liquid
to solid state.
By contrast, the processes that bind staples of fiber
into threads and yarns, yarns into textiles,
and textiles into garments
involve entanglements that allow for bending, stretching, and shearing -
all scarcely afforded in painting.
When thinking about familiar textile process as entanglement, it is
helpful to elaborate what is being controlled tightly by the process and
what is allowed to run free. For example in spinning staples, the length
and orientation of staples is carefully managed but the exact position
of each staple and amount of twist are not as carefully controlled.
Some useful descriptive terms for elements of this process are:
Syntropic - in the same direction
Symplectic - braided together
In larger scale structures, such as ropes, this term is helpful
Syndetic - bound together
Most large assemblies combine processes.: Knits and weaves, for example,
are often knotted at the edges to avoid unraveling. Embroidery is stitching into
a base fabric.
Felted hats are an interesting contrasting structure to consider because the staple
orientation is not controlled but the staple entanglement, fabric
thickness and shape are.
Why go to all this trouble of hoisting textile and fiber processes into
a new conceptual framework? For me it serves as a bridge to move
knowledge in one field of activity efficiently to another
one–electromagnetics, for example. When conductive threads are organized
into certain shapes within fabrics and electrical current is passed through
them entangled electric and magnetic fields are produced that may serve
as loudspeakers, microphones, antennas, capacitive
proximity sensors, etc. These entanglements are coproduced, coterminal
and coextensive with textile and fiber entanglements. Plurifunctional creations of this sort
beg to be thought of in a unified framework that seeks to celebrate synergies without prematurely muting
any particular function or property.
I document plenty of examples[3] of work based on the ideas above. My early work focussed on intrinsic fiber sensing.